public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.31.6: XFS DEBUG: Assertions cause kernel OOPS.
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 10:58:03 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091201235803.GK30608@discord.disaster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0912011338000.1185@p34.internal.lan>

On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 01:39:06PM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, Dave Chinner wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 08:22:03AM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I wanted to compile my kernel with DEBUG for XFS and also kernel frame pointers
>>> to catch any issues.
>>>
>>> However, DEBUG for XFS does more harm than good?
>>
>> DEBUG is there for developers, not end users. Often the debug code
>> will assert fail or panic where the situation is not fatal but
>> indicative of some problem that should be looked into further.
> Dave,
>
> Recall that issue that I was having with asterisk installed?

Yes, it appeared to be caused by log IO not completing, right?

> How should  
> one get more information on a filesystem lockup if we cannot have debug  
> enabled for the filesystem?

The debug code in XFS won't tell you anything extra about a lock-up
unless it trips an ASSERT before the lockup that is related to the
lock-up. My experience with hangs like the above are that they
generally are not related to the filesystem at all; most of the time
it is IO not being completed by the lower layers for some reason,
and no amount of filesystem level debug will help solve that
problem.

> Should there be a user-debug option which it 
> will include more verbosity if/when the xfs kernel processes lockup?

See /proc/sys/fs/xfs/error_level. That can turn up the verbosity of
error reporting without needing DEBUG compiled in.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

      reply	other threads:[~2009-12-01 23:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-30 13:22 2.6.31.6: XFS DEBUG: Assertions cause kernel OOPS Justin Piszcz
2009-11-30 13:59 ` Alex Elder
2009-11-30 14:15   ` Justin Piszcz
2009-11-30 23:38 ` Dave Chinner
2009-12-01 18:39   ` Justin Piszcz
2009-12-01 23:58     ` Dave Chinner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091201235803.GK30608@discord.disaster \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox