From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com>
Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id
	nBNDWbH0238142 for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 07:32:38 -0600
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 08:33:21 -0500
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] improve xfsinvutil man page and argument processing
Message-ID: <20091223133321.GA10982@infradead.org>
References: <4B300507.1070502@sgi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4B300507.1070502@sgi.com>
List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI <xfs.oss.sgi.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/options/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs>
List-Post: <mailto:xfs@oss.sgi.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
To: Bill Kendall <wkendall@sgi.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com

On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 05:30:15PM -0600, Bill Kendall wrote:
> xfsinvtuil's man page is not clear about which options
> may be used together. The argument processing was
> not very complete either. Document and enforce the
> following:

Looks good,


Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs