From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o02Ck1eV109169 for ; Sat, 2 Jan 2010 06:46:01 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 4CB5E172F08B for ; Sat, 2 Jan 2010 04:46:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id pEF46NtbYKwgx6BR for ; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 04:46:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 07:46:49 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] XFS: Kill filestreams cache flush Message-ID: <20100102124649.GA8004@infradead.org> References: <1262399900-19110-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20100102115338.GA18502@infradead.org> <20100102121203.GG13802@discord.disaster> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100102121203.GG13802@discord.disaster> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 11:12:03PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > Which means that sync destroys active filestreams associations and > that seems more broken to me than anything an active reference will > cause. I think just letting them time out is better than having them > destroyed by external operations. I'm happy to leave it there if you > want.... Just trying to understand what's going on here. If you think the new behaviour is better and it doesn't cause any regressions in QA I'm fine with it. Consider it: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs