From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o0BAHhNH129660 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 04:17:45 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 6D69D1C40EAF for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 02:18:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Ggsp201BtEwUYBCo for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 02:18:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 05:18:36 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs: reclaim inodes under a write lock Message-ID: <20100111101836.GA26465@infradead.org> References: <1263167508-9346-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1263167508-9346-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1263167508-9346-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:51:45AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > Make the inode tree reclaim walk exclusive to avoid races with > concurrent sync walkers and lookups. This is a version of > a patch posted by Christoph Hellwig that avoids all the code > duplication. looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig FYI: I would rename xfs_reclaim_inode_now to just xfs_reclaim_inode, but unless Alex wants to edit it let's just get the patch in for now. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs