From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o0BAIKVW129715 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 04:18:20 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 6D4E01357D4F for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 02:19:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 9bL63aD9D2DQQeHv for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 02:19:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 05:19:14 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] xfs: Avoid inodes in reclaim when flushing from inode cache Message-ID: <20100111101914.GB26465@infradead.org> References: <1263167508-9346-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1263167508-9346-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1263167508-9346-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:51:46AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > THe reclaim code will handle flushing of dirty inodes before > reclaim occurs, so avoid them when determining whether an inode is > a candidate for flushing to disk when walking the radix trees. > This is based on a test patch from Christoph Hellwig. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs