public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfstests: test quota log replay in 087
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 23:02:56 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100112120256.GD17483@discord.disaster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100110212619.GA30907@infradead.org>

On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 04:26:19PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> By mounting the filesystem with quotas enabled in 087 we exercise the
> replay of the quota log items in this tests, which we otherwise don't
> test in xfstests.  OSS bugzilla #855 is an example of something caught
> by this.
> 
> Does this look okay, or should I add a duplicate of 
> 087 with quotas enabled instead?

I think having 087 cover quotas as well is fine. Adding a separate
test just for quotas doesn't provide any extra coverage compared to
this patch.


> @@ -98,7 +100,7 @@ do
>  
>      # mount the FS
>      _echofull "mount"
> -    if ! _scratch_mount >>$seq.full 2>&1; then
> +    if ! _scratch_mount -o uquota >>$seq.full 2>&1; then

My only question is whether this will work if uquota is set up as a
global option. I haven't looked into it yet, but there appears to be
several different ways that uquota is specified in other tests:

052:_qmount_option uquota
108:export MOUNT_OPTIONS="-ouquota"
116:mount -o uquota $SCRATCH_DEV $SCRATCH_MNT
220:_scratch_mount -o uquota

Some consistency would be nice, but I don't think it's a problem
for this patch right now.

Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>

-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

      reply	other threads:[~2010-01-12 12:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-10 21:26 [PATCH, RFC] xfstests: test quota log replay in 087 Christoph Hellwig
2010-01-12 12:02 ` Dave Chinner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100112120256.GD17483@discord.disaster \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox