From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o0EBZpGh256718 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 05:35:51 -0600 Received: from one.firstfloor.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id B82391C4E7A5 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 03:36:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from one.firstfloor.org (one.firstfloor.org [213.235.205.2]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id dOYJiw7mfaMAUXqt for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 03:36:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:36:44 +0100 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: XFS data corruption with high I/O even on hardware raid Message-ID: <20100114113644.GL12241@basil.fritz.box> References: <4B4E6F3F.1090901@chaven.com> <87hbqpf3zv.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <4B4EFDD5.5060408@chaven.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B4EFDD5.5060408@chaven.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Steve Costaras Cc: Andi Kleen , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 05:19:49AM -0600, Steve Costaras wrote: > It's the current kernel for the distribution, however I take your point. The deal is usually -- when you stay with old distribution kernels you have to contact the distribution for any problems. > I did have a 2.6.28 kernel running on another system that also exhibited That's also a very old kernel in mainline terms. Current is 2.6.32 -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs