From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o0JNBZQl224179 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:11:35 -0600 Received: from mail.internode.on.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 024A41C63BC3 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:12:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.internode.on.net (bld-mail18.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.103]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id ikpv4LQAcFjbRIYd for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:12:33 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:12:30 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] [PATCH] xfs: remove duplicate buffer flags Message-ID: <20100119231230.GD14035@discord.disaster> References: <20100119095643.378866749@bombadil.infradead.org> <20100119095654.708720933@bombadil.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100119095654.708720933@bombadil.infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 04:56:44AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Currently we define aliases for the buffer flags in various namespaces, > which only adds confusion. Remove all but the XBF_ flags to clean this > up a bit. > > Note that we still abuse XFS_B_ASYNC/XBF_ASYNC for some non-buffer uses, > but I'll clean that up later. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Looks good. This has been on my "things for a rainy day" list for quite some time. Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs