From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o0K8H9XC253417 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 02:17:12 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 2E2691C64CFD for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:18:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id kEj3XPAiDrKUeAJ3 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:18:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:18:07 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: kill in 131 needs to be quiet Message-ID: <20100120081807.GA9968@infradead.org> References: <1263967126-7603-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1263967126-7603-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 04:58:46PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > If the kill fails because the processes have already terminates, > the output from kill (no such process) will cause the test to > fail. Make sure kill doesn't output anything. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner Yes, I see the same here, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs