From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o0LHrXSd086434 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:53:34 -0600 Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:54:34 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: fix format string warnings in locktest.c Message-ID: <20100121175434.GA6681@infradead.org> References: <20100121173237.GA25322@infradead.org> <1AB9A794DBDDF54A8A81BE2296F7BDFE012A69B0@cf--amer001e--3.americas.sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1AB9A794DBDDF54A8A81BE2296F7BDFE012A69B0@cf--amer001e--3.americas.sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Alex Elder Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:50:17AM -0600, Alex Elder wrote: > Ah, yes, you are correct. So the right fix is a combination > of the two patches. All I noticed was that when I tried to > apply your patch on top of Dave's it didn't work... I just commited mine to the xfstests-dev tree which already contains Dave's patch and everything went fine. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs