From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o0P8GkdK043242 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 02:16:47 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id CA85E1C77168 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:17:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id U5d4ndpYJ34xmLbH for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:17:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 03:17:50 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] xfs: use scalable vmap API Message-ID: <20100125081750.GA20012@infradead.org> References: <20081021082542.GA6974@wotan.suse.de> <20081021082735.GB6974@wotan.suse.de> <20081021120932.GB13348@infradead.org> <20081022093018.GD4359@wotan.suse.de> <20100119121505.GA9428@infradead.org> <20100125075445.GD19664@laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100125075445.GD19664@laptop> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Nick Piggin Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-mm@kvack.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 06:54:45PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote: > Is this on a 32-bit system with small vmalloc area? Yes. > When the vmap allocation fails, it would be good to basically see the > alloc_map and dirty_map for each of the vmap_blocks. This is going to be > a lot of information. Basically for all blocks with > free+dirty == VMAP_BBMAP_BITS are ones that could be released and you > could try the alloc again. Any easy way to get them? Sorry, not uptodate on your new vmalloc implementation anymore. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs