From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o0UJ7Lek230949 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:07:22 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id C44921C9231B for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:08:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id At2OsDMJSe2IKRI9 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:08:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:08:28 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: make 053 and 077 generic Message-ID: <20100130190828.GA10181@infradead.org> References: <4B621E11.4050609@sandeen.net> <20100130102639.GC32695@infradead.org> <4B6459A1.4060900@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B6459A1.4060900@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs-oss On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 10:09:05AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > Btw, any reason _acl_requirements isn't called _require_acl? > > It already existed, I just used it ... renaming is probably a good idea. Yeah, just asking questions to myself while reading the patch.. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs