From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o1329f7I204182 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 20:09:42 -0600 Received: from mail.internode.on.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id E73881C9B823 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 18:10:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.internode.on.net (bld-mail17.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.102]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id sbNWRmucSSRvzwA7 for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:10:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:59:11 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] xfs: Use delayed write for inodes rather than async Message-ID: <20100201225911.GA26252@discord.disaster> References: <1264400564-19704-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1264400564-19704-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20100125115308.GC8595@infradead.org> <20100125223140.GN25842@discord.disaster> <20100126161045.GB24152@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100126161045.GB24152@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:10:45AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > Also in this context > > > the requeue label name doesn't fit too well, even if it's the same > > > action as the requeue. > > > > I'm open to suggestions for a better name ;) > > What do you think about this version? Yeah, that looks a lot better. I'll incorporate that into the patch. Thanks. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs