From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o1ALuUDi083837 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:56:31 -0600 Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:57:44 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] xfs_export_operations.commit_metadata Message-ID: <20100210215744.GB25004@infradead.org> References: <20100210003220.6021.74943.stgit@case> <20100210003337.6021.10942.stgit@case> <20100210090750.GB21875@infradead.org> <20100210201527.GJ23654@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100210201527.GJ23654@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: bpm@sgi.com Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 02:15:27PM -0600, bpm@sgi.com wrote: > > Note that _xfs_log_force_lsn is new in the XFS tree, mainline still > > has _xfs_log_force with an lsn argument. > > I've been working with Bruce's tree. Not sure how best to handle that. Keep working against it for now, the merge fixup will be easy enough. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs