From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o1FLmZhC091125 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:48:36 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id F06F21CD160F for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:49:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id XEA56RYhhief4mkH for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:49:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:49:52 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] implement optimized fdatasync Message-ID: <20100215214951.GA1036@infradead.org> References: <20100215094445.528696829@bombadil.infradead.org> <877hqemcqz.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <877hqemcqz.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Andi Kleen Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:04:52PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > Christoph Hellwig writes: > > > This series implements a real fdatasync, that is one that is not > > simply identical to fdatasync, but one that skips logging the inode > > > ... to fsync? Yes, Chris Wedgwood also pointed this out privately already. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs