From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o1JATIBp126281 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:29:20 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 7C71F1E0FC1 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 02:30:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id XTXwOQtufT98JqWK for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 02:30:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 05:30:37 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: don't delete scratch loop device w/ umount -d Message-ID: <20100219103037.GA21674@infradead.org> References: <4B7C51B2.9080908@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B7C51B2.9080908@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: xfs mailing list On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 02:29:38PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Recent fixes to 073 added umount -d, but if we happen > to be using a scratch device on loopback, subsequent > tests get very, very unhappy when their loopback block > device goes away! True, we only need -d for the loop devices created in the test. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs