From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] xfs: log ticket reservation underestimates the number of iclogs
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:13:54 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100315021354.GJ4732@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1267840284-4652-8-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
Ping?
On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 12:51:22PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> When allocation a ticket for a transaction, the ticket is initialised with the
> worst case log space usage based on the number of bytes the transaction may
> consume. Part of this calculation is the number of log headers required for the
> iclog space used up by the transaction.
>
> This calculation makes an undocumented assumption that if the transaction uses
> the log header space reservation on an iclog, then it consumes either the
> entire iclog or it completes. That is - the transaction that is first in an
> iclog is the transaction that the log header reservation is accounted to. If
> the transaction is larger than the iclog, then it will use the entire iclog
> itself. Document this assumption.
>
> Further, the current calculation uses the rule that we can fit iclog_size bytes
> of transaction data into an iclog. This is in correct - the amount of space
> available in an iclog for transaction data is the size of the iclog minus the
> space used for log record headers. This means that the calculation is out by
> 512 bytes per 32k of log space the transaction can consume. This is rarely an
> issue because maximally sized transactions are extremely uncommon, and for 4k
> block size filesystems maximal transaction reservations are about 400kb. Hence
> the error in this case is less than the size of an iclog, so that makes it even
> harder to hit.
>
> However, anyone using larger directory blocks (16k directory blocks push the
> maximum transaction size to approx. 900k on a 4k block size filesystem) or
> larger block size (e.g. 64k blocks push transactions to the 3-4MB size) could
> see the error grow to more than an iclog and at this point the transaction is
> guaranteed to get a reservation underrun and shutdown the filesystem.
>
> Fix this by adjusting the calculation to calculate the correct number of iclogs
> required and account for them all up front.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_log.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> index 1f26a97..7c6b0cd 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> @@ -664,7 +664,10 @@ xfs_log_item_init(
> /*
> * Write region vectors to log. The write happens using the space reservation
> * of the ticket (tic). It is not a requirement that all writes for a given
> - * transaction occur with one call to xfs_log_write().
> + * transaction occur with one call to xfs_log_write(). However, it is important
> + * to note that the transaction reservation code makes an assumption about the
> + * number of log headers a transaction requires that may be violated if you
> + * don't pass all the transaction vectors in one call....
> */
> int
> xfs_log_write(
> @@ -3156,14 +3159,16 @@ xfs_log_ticket_get(
> * Allocate and initialise a new log ticket.
> */
> STATIC xlog_ticket_t *
> -xlog_ticket_alloc(xlog_t *log,
> - int unit_bytes,
> - int cnt,
> - char client,
> - uint xflags)
> +xlog_ticket_alloc(
> + struct log *log,
> + int unit_bytes,
> + int cnt,
> + char client,
> + uint xflags)
> {
> - xlog_ticket_t *tic;
> + struct xlog_ticket *tic;
> uint num_headers;
> + int iclog_space;
>
> tic = kmem_zone_zalloc(xfs_log_ticket_zone, KM_SLEEP|KM_MAYFAIL);
> if (!tic)
> @@ -3207,16 +3212,40 @@ xlog_ticket_alloc(xlog_t *log,
> /* for start-rec */
> unit_bytes += sizeof(xlog_op_header_t);
>
> - /* for LR headers */
> - num_headers = ((unit_bytes + log->l_iclog_size-1) >> log->l_iclog_size_log);
> + /*
> + * for LR headers - the space for data in an iclog is the size minus
> + * the space used for the headers. If we use the iclog size, then we
> + * undercalculate the number of headers required.
> + *
> + * Furthermore - the addition of op headers for split-recs might
> + * increase the space required enough to require more log and op
> + * headers, so take that into account too.
> + *
> + * IMPORTANT: This reservation makes the assumption that if this
> + * transaction is the first in an iclog and hence has the LR headers
> + * accounted to it, then the remaining space in the iclog is
> + * exclusively for this transaction. i.e. if the transaction is larger
> + * than the iclog, it will be the only thing in that iclog.
> + * Fundamentally, this means we must pass the entire log vector to
> + * xlog_write to guarantee this.
> + */
> + iclog_space = log->l_iclog_size - log->l_iclog_hsize;
> + num_headers = (unit_bytes + iclog_space - 1) / iclog_space;
> +
> + /* for split-recs - ophdrs added when data split over LRs */
> + unit_bytes += sizeof(xlog_op_header_t) * num_headers;
> +
> + /* add extra header reservations if we overrun */
> + while (!num_headers ||
> + ((unit_bytes + iclog_space - 1) / iclog_space) > num_headers) {
> + unit_bytes += sizeof(xlog_op_header_t);
> + num_headers++;
> + }
> unit_bytes += log->l_iclog_hsize * num_headers;
>
> /* for commit-rec LR header - note: padding will subsume the ophdr */
> unit_bytes += log->l_iclog_hsize;
>
> - /* for split-recs - ophdrs added when data split over LRs */
> - unit_bytes += sizeof(xlog_op_header_t) * num_headers;
> -
> /* for roundoff padding for transaction data and one for commit record */
> if (xfs_sb_version_haslogv2(&log->l_mp->m_sb) &&
> log->l_mp->m_sb.sb_logsunit > 1) {
> @@ -3238,7 +3267,7 @@ xlog_ticket_alloc(xlog_t *log,
> tic->t_trans_type = 0;
> if (xflags & XFS_LOG_PERM_RESERV)
> tic->t_flags |= XLOG_TIC_PERM_RESERV;
> - sv_init(&(tic->t_wait), SV_DEFAULT, "logtick");
> + sv_init(&tic->t_wait, SV_DEFAULT, "logtick");
>
> xlog_tic_reset_res(tic);
>
> --
> 1.6.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
>
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-15 2:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-06 1:51 [PATCH 0/9] Log and transaction cleanups, factoring and bug fixes Dave Chinner
2010-03-06 1:51 ` [PATCH 1/9] xfs: factor log item initialisation Dave Chinner
2010-03-06 10:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-03-06 1:51 ` [PATCH 2/9] xfs: Add inode pin counts to traces Dave Chinner
2010-03-06 10:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-03-06 1:51 ` [PATCH 3/9] xfs: remove stale parameter from ->iop_unpin method Dave Chinner
2010-03-06 10:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-03-06 1:51 ` [PATCH 4/9] xfs: fix reservation release commit flag in xfs_bmap_add_attrfork() Dave Chinner
2010-03-06 10:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-03-06 1:51 ` [PATCH 5/9] xfs: split out iclog writing from xfs_trans_commit() Dave Chinner
2010-03-06 11:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-03-06 11:57 ` Dave Chinner
2010-03-06 1:51 ` [PATCH 6/9] xfs: update and factor xfs_trans_committed() Dave Chinner
2010-03-06 11:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-03-06 12:01 ` Dave Chinner
2010-03-06 1:51 ` [PATCH 7/9] xfs: log ticket reservation underestimates the number of iclogs Dave Chinner
2010-03-15 2:13 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2010-03-06 1:51 ` [PATCH 8/9] xfs: introduce new internal log vector structure Dave Chinner
2010-03-06 11:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-03-06 12:06 ` Dave Chinner
2010-03-06 15:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-03-08 1:16 ` Dave Chinner
2010-03-06 1:51 ` [PATCH 9/9] xfs: factor xlog_write and make use of new " Dave Chinner
2010-03-06 15:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-03-06 10:56 ` [PATCH 0/9] Log and transaction cleanups, factoring and bug fixes Christoph Hellwig
2010-03-09 11:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-03-09 11:48 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100315021354.GJ4732@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox