From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o2R94pTJ069163 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 04:04:51 -0500 Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 401C61A63CEE for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 02:06:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr (smtp5-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.5]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id oVEgzZ8nL6x5StG8 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 02:06:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 10:06:18 +0100 From: Emmanuel Florac Subject: Re: 128TB filesystem limit? Message-ID: <20100327100618.71e24a0a@galadriel.home> In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: david@lang.hm Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Le Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:15:42 -0700 (PDT) vous =E9criviez: > is this just rounding error combined with the 1000=3D1k vs 1024=3D1k > marketing stuff, or is there some limit I am bumping into here. This isn't an xfs limit, I've set up several hundred big xfs FS for more than 5 years (13 to 76 TB) and never saw that. It must be a bug in df or elsewhere. What distribution is this? and architecture? -- = ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique | Intellique | | +33 1 78 94 84 02 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs