From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o339NaOK033875 for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 04:23:37 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id EB5CCF9A25D for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 02:25:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id bdNC3unno7XfI5qz for ; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 02:25:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 05:25:23 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] xfs: don't warn on EAGAIN in inode reclaim Message-ID: <20100403092523.GC20166@infradead.org> References: <1270125691-29266-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1270125691-29266-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1270125691-29266-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 11:41:25PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner > > Any inode reclaim flush that returns EAGAIN will result in the inode > reclaim being attempted again later. There is no need to issue a > warning into the logs about this situation. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner > Reviewed-by: Alex Elder Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs