From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 7/10] xfs: tidy up some goto labels
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:52:32 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100412065232.GI2493@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1270852163.7840.154.camel@doink>
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 05:29:23PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
> Rename a label used in xlog_find_head() that I thought was poorly
> chosen. Also combine two adjacent labels xlog_find_tail() into
> a single label, and give it a more generic name.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c | 20 +++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> Index: b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> @@ -739,7 +739,7 @@ xlog_find_head(
> goto bp_err;
> if (new_blk != -1) {
> head_blk = new_blk;
> - goto bad_blk;
> + goto fine_tune;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -757,7 +757,7 @@ xlog_find_head(
> head_blk = new_blk;
> }
>
> - bad_blk:
> +fine_tune:
> /*
> * Now we need to make sure head_blk is not pointing to a block in
> * the middle of a log record.
I don't think "fine_tune" really matches what is being done here
either. "bad_blk" makes sense when you consider that the search is
being terminated due to a log block being found that didn't match
the search criteria. i.e. it is bad.
What we are really doing there at "bad_blk" is validating the head
block we have found, so if you are going to change the label then
"validate_head" makes more sense to me...
> @@ -864,12 +864,12 @@ xlog_find_tail(
> if (*head_blk == 0) { /* special case */
> error = xlog_bread(log, 0, 1, bp, &offset);
> if (error)
> - goto bread_err;
> + goto done;
>
> if (xlog_get_cycle(offset) == 0) {
> *tail_blk = 0;
> /* leave all other log inited values alone */
> - goto exit;
> + goto done;
> }
> }
These changes look fine, though.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-13 1:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-09 22:29 [PATCHv2 7/10] xfs: tidy up some goto labels Alex Elder
2010-04-12 6:52 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2010-04-14 20:20 ` Alex Elder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100412065232.GI2493@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=aelder@sgi.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox