From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o3H7CGIc044677 for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 02:12:16 -0500 Received: from smtp6-g21.free.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id E22732CC374 for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 00:14:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp6-g21.free.fr (smtp6-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.6]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id MC8FhDAFfz6Vuc6F for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 00:14:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 09:13:57 +0200 From: Emmanuel Florac Subject: Re: xfs_fsr question for improvement Message-ID: <20100417091357.4e7ad1e0@galadriel.home> In-Reply-To: <20100417012415.GE2493@dastard> References: <201004161043.11243@zmi.at> <20100417012415.GE2493@dastard> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Michael Monnerie , xfs@oss.sgi.com Le Sat, 17 Apr 2010 11:24:15 +1000 vous =E9criviez: > XFS resists fragmentation better than most other > filesystems, so defragmentation, while possible, is generally not > needed. There two systems nevertheless where I need to use xfs_fsr regularly to keep decent performance : my test VMware server (performance dropped down to abysmal level until I set up a daily xfs_fsr cron job), and a write-intensive video server. -- = ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique | Intellique | | +33 1 78 94 84 02 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs