From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] [PATCH] xfs: simplify buffer to transaction matching
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:41:55 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100420064155.GH15130@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100418001058.677429475@bombadil.infradead.org>
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 08:10:45PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> We currenly have a routine xfs_trans_buf_item_match_all which checks if any
> log item in a transaction contains a given buffer, and a second one that
> only does this check for the first, embedded chunk of log items. We only
> use the second routine if we know we only have that log item chunk, so get
> rid of the limited routine and always use the more complete one.
>
> Also rename the old xfs_trans_buf_item_match_all to xfs_trans_buf_item_match
> and update various surrounding comments, and move the remaining
> xfs_trans_buf_item_match on top of the file to avoid a forward prototype.
Good start, but I think that it should use xfs_trans_first_item()
and xfs_trans_next_item() rather than walking the descriptor
table directly.
i.e:
len = BBTOB(len);
lidp = xfs_trans_first_item(tp);
while (lidp != NULL) {
blip = (xfs_buf_log_item_t *)lidp->lid_item;
lidp = xfs_trans_next_item(tp, lidp);
if (blip->bli_item.li_type != XFS_LI_BUF)
continue;
if (XFS_BUF_TARGET(blip->bli_buf) == target &&
XFS_BUF_ADDR(blip->bli_buf) == blkno &&
XFS_BUF_COUNT(blip->bli_buf) == len)
return blip->bli_buf;
}
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-20 6:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-18 0:10 [PATCH 0/5] various cleanups for 2.6.35 Christoph Hellwig
2010-04-18 0:10 ` [PATCH 1/5] xfs: access quotainfo structure directly Christoph Hellwig
2010-04-20 6:28 ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-18 0:10 ` [PATCH 2/5] xfs: remove a few macro indirections in the quota code Christoph Hellwig
2010-04-20 6:31 ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-18 0:10 ` [PATCH 3/5] xfs: removed unused XFS_QMOPT_ flags Christoph Hellwig
2010-04-20 6:33 ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-22 11:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-04-18 0:10 ` [PATCH 4/5] [PATCH] xfs: simplify buffer to transaction matching Christoph Hellwig
2010-04-20 6:41 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2010-05-01 12:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-05-03 4:23 ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-27 14:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-04-29 13:35 ` Alex Elder
2010-04-29 13:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-04-18 0:10 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: remove dead XFS_LOUD_RECOVERY code Christoph Hellwig
2010-04-20 6:44 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100420064155.GH15130@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox