From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o3MB5x5Q191762 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 06:05:59 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 4D0852E4E16 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 04:07:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id GgrIGdp5xkJAc9tl for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 04:07:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 07:07:58 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: Improve scalability of busy extent tracking Message-ID: <20100422110758.GA22295@infradead.org> References: <1271828835-2094-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1271828835-2094-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Oh, and while I'm at it: I'd move the list_del_init(&busyp->list); from xfs_trans_free_busy into xfs_alloc_clear_busy, we also do the list insertation inside xfs_alloc_busy_insert, so that makes it symmetic. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs