From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o3MGVsgS214848 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 11:31:54 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 6DED04DA35A for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:33:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id V4X8mnDGa4sHdJw3 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:33:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:33:55 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: mkfs.xfs man page for -nsize Message-ID: <20100422163355.GA6360@infradead.org> References: <20100422124118.GA3406@laptop.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100422124118.GA3406@laptop.oracle.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Wengang Wang Cc: greg.marsden@oracle.com, joe.jin@oracle.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 08:41:18PM +0800, Wengang Wang wrote: > I got no idea why the value is illegal. > > Checking the codes, I found it also must be larger or equal to block size and it > must be in powers of 2, 2^N. Should we add these two limitation to man page? Yes, this should be added to the man page. Can you submit a patch to add it? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs