From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
stable-review@kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: [021/197] xfs: fix stale inode flush avoidance
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:07:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100422190909.292577470@kvm.kroah.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100422191857.GA13268@kroah.com>
2.6.32-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
commit 4b6a46882cca8349e8942e2650c33b11bc571c92 upstream
When reclaiming stale inodes, we need to guarantee that inodes are
unpinned before returning with a "clean" status. If we don't we can
reclaim inodes that are pinned, leading to use after free in the
transaction subsystem as transactions complete.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
@@ -2878,13 +2878,9 @@ xfs_iflush(
/*
* If the inode isn't dirty, then just release the inode flush lock and
- * do nothing. Treat stale inodes the same; we cannot rely on the
- * backing buffer remaining stale in cache for the remaining life of
- * the stale inode and so xfs_itobp() below may give us a buffer that
- * no longer contains inodes below. Doing this stale check here also
- * avoids forcing the log on pinned, stale inodes.
+ * do nothing.
*/
- if (xfs_inode_clean(ip) || xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_ISTALE)) {
+ if (xfs_inode_clean(ip)) {
xfs_ifunlock(ip);
return 0;
}
@@ -2908,6 +2904,19 @@ xfs_iflush(
xfs_iunpin_wait(ip);
/*
+ * For stale inodes we cannot rely on the backing buffer remaining
+ * stale in cache for the remaining life of the stale inode and so
+ * xfs_itobp() below may give us a buffer that no longer contains
+ * inodes below. We have to check this after ensuring the inode is
+ * unpinned so that it is safe to reclaim the stale inode after the
+ * flush call.
+ */
+ if (xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_ISTALE)) {
+ xfs_ifunlock(ip);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ /*
* This may have been unpinned because the filesystem is shutting
* down forcibly. If that's the case we must not write this inode
* to disk, because the log record didn't make it to disk!
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-22 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20100422191857.GA13268@kroah.com>
2010-04-22 19:07 ` [009/197] xfs: simplify inode teardown Greg KH
2010-04-22 19:07 ` [010/197] xfs: fix mmap_sem/iolock inversion in xfs_free_eofblocks Greg KH
2010-04-22 19:07 ` [011/197] xfs: I/O completion handlers must use NOFS allocations Greg KH
2010-04-22 19:07 ` [012/197] xfs: Wrapped journal record corruption on read at recovery Greg KH
2010-04-22 19:07 ` [013/197] xfs: Fix error return for fallocate() on XFS Greg KH
2010-04-22 19:07 ` [014/197] xfs: check for not fully initialized inodes in xfs_ireclaim Greg KH
2010-04-22 19:07 ` [015/197] xfs: fix timestamp handling in xfs_setattr Greg KH
2010-04-22 19:07 ` [016/197] xfs: Dont flush stale inodes Greg KH
2010-04-22 19:07 ` [017/197] xfs: Ensure we force all busy extents in range to disk Greg KH
2010-04-22 19:07 ` [018/197] xfs: reclaim inodes under a write lock Greg KH
2010-04-22 19:07 ` [019/197] xfs: Avoid inodes in reclaim when flushing from inode cache Greg KH
2010-04-22 19:07 ` [020/197] xfs: reclaim all inodes by background tree walks Greg KH
2010-04-22 19:07 ` Greg KH [this message]
2010-04-22 19:07 ` [022/197] xfs: xfs_swap_extents needs to handle dynamic fork offsets Greg KH
2010-04-22 19:07 ` [023/197] xfs: quota limit statvfs available blocks Greg KH
2010-04-22 19:07 ` [024/197] xfs: dont hold onto reserved blocks on remount, ro Greg KH
2010-04-22 19:07 ` [025/197] xfs: remove invalid barrier optimization from xfs_fsync Greg KH
2010-04-22 19:07 ` [026/197] xfs: Non-blocking inode locking in IO completion Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100422190909.292577470@kvm.kroah.org \
--to=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=aelder@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable-review@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox