From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org
Cc: stable-review@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: [025/197] xfs: remove invalid barrier optimization from xfs_fsync
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:07:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100422190909.635239163@kvm.kroah.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100422191857.GA13268@kroah.com>
2.6.32-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
commit e8b217e7530c6a073ac69f1c85b922d93fdf5647 upstream
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:16:26 +1100
We always need to flush the disk write cache and can't skip it just because
the no inode attributes have changed.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c | 12 ++----------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c
@@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ xfs_fsync(
{
xfs_trans_t *tp;
int error = 0;
- int log_flushed = 0, changed = 1;
+ int log_flushed = 0;
xfs_itrace_entry(ip);
@@ -627,19 +627,11 @@ xfs_fsync(
* disk yet, the inode will be still be pinned. If it is,
* force the log.
*/
-
xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_SHARED);
-
if (xfs_ipincount(ip)) {
error = _xfs_log_force(ip->i_mount, (xfs_lsn_t)0,
XFS_LOG_FORCE | XFS_LOG_SYNC,
&log_flushed);
- } else {
- /*
- * If the inode is not pinned and nothing has changed
- * we don't need to flush the cache.
- */
- changed = 0;
}
} else {
/*
@@ -674,7 +666,7 @@ xfs_fsync(
xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
}
- if ((ip->i_mount->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_BARRIER) && changed) {
+ if (ip->i_mount->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_BARRIER) {
/*
* If the log write didn't issue an ordered tag we need
* to flush the disk cache for the data device now.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-22 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20100422191857.GA13268@kroah.com>
2010-04-22 19:07 ` [009/197] xfs: simplify inode teardown Greg KH
2010-04-22 19:07 ` [010/197] xfs: fix mmap_sem/iolock inversion in xfs_free_eofblocks Greg KH
2010-04-22 19:07 ` [011/197] xfs: I/O completion handlers must use NOFS allocations Greg KH
2010-04-22 19:07 ` [012/197] xfs: Wrapped journal record corruption on read at recovery Greg KH
2010-04-22 19:07 ` [013/197] xfs: Fix error return for fallocate() on XFS Greg KH
2010-04-22 19:07 ` [014/197] xfs: check for not fully initialized inodes in xfs_ireclaim Greg KH
2010-04-22 19:07 ` [015/197] xfs: fix timestamp handling in xfs_setattr Greg KH
2010-04-22 19:07 ` [016/197] xfs: Dont flush stale inodes Greg KH
2010-04-22 19:07 ` [017/197] xfs: Ensure we force all busy extents in range to disk Greg KH
2010-04-22 19:07 ` [018/197] xfs: reclaim inodes under a write lock Greg KH
2010-04-22 19:07 ` [019/197] xfs: Avoid inodes in reclaim when flushing from inode cache Greg KH
2010-04-22 19:07 ` [020/197] xfs: reclaim all inodes by background tree walks Greg KH
2010-04-22 19:07 ` [021/197] xfs: fix stale inode flush avoidance Greg KH
2010-04-22 19:07 ` [022/197] xfs: xfs_swap_extents needs to handle dynamic fork offsets Greg KH
2010-04-22 19:07 ` [023/197] xfs: quota limit statvfs available blocks Greg KH
2010-04-22 19:07 ` [024/197] xfs: dont hold onto reserved blocks on remount, ro Greg KH
2010-04-22 19:07 ` Greg KH [this message]
2010-04-22 19:07 ` [026/197] xfs: Non-blocking inode locking in IO completion Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100422190909.635239163@kvm.kroah.org \
--to=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable-review@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox