From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o3PA7oh7254029 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 05:07:50 -0500 Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id CDD798CA141 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 03:09:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com (rcsinet10.oracle.com [148.87.113.121]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id P30FldAei5SKsYJp for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 03:09:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:08:33 +0800 From: Wengang Wang Subject: Re: is realtime device supported? Message-ID: <20100425100833.GA2361@laptop.us.oracle.com> References: <20100422144939.GA3822@laptop.oracle.com> <20100422162325.GA29668@infradead.org> <4BD07F06.70101@sandeen.net> <20100423030011.GB2949@laptop.oracle.com> <4BD111CA.4040205@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BD111CA.4040205@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com, greg.marsden@oracle.com, joe.jin@oracle.com, Wengang Wang Hi Eirc, On 10-04-22 22:19, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Wengang Wang wrote: > > On 10-04-22 11:53, Eric Sandeen wrote: > >> Christoph Hellwig wrote: > >>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:49:39PM +0800, Wengang Wang wrote: > >>>> Do we support realtime device? > >>>> > >>>> I got the following error: > >>> It sounds like you do not have CONFIG_XFS_RT enable in your kernel > >>> configuration. But to answer your original question the realtime > >>> device is not supported in the sense of actively maintained. The > >>> code is still there, but more or less for legacy reasons. I would > >>> not recommend it for new installations. > > > > Yes, CONFIG_XFS_RT is disabled. > > [wwg@desk linux-2.6.18.x86_64]$ grep CONFIG_XFS_RT .config > > # CONFIG_XFS_RT is not set > > > > And Ok I see. Also should we add the point to man page of mkfs.xfs? > > > >> Agreed. > >> > >> FWIW, dmesg probably gave you a more helpful error message than > >> mount... > >> > >> cmn_err(CE_WARN, "XFS: RT mount failed"); > >> > >> hm or maybe not ;) > > > > Only "XFS: RT mount failed" :) > > A patch to explicitly say that it failed because CONFIG_XFS_RT was off > would be happily accepted, too. Yes. I will try to make the patch. > > I am curious, are you doing a lot of QA type work on xfs? You are finding > some interesting things that could certainly be fixed up, we appreciate it. I am just interested in it :). I like to play with various file systems. regards, wengang. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs