From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o3TAGl7d062043 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 05:16:49 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id F231D1D49293 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 03:18:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 1Pp6DqgXowTxeKpU for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 03:18:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 06:18:50 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfsqa: clean up 030 repair output Message-ID: <20100429101850.GA29677@infradead.org> References: <1272500186-29393-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1272500186-29393-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1272500186-29393-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:16:24AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > With the new checks in xfs_repair, it outputs more information > about errors found than previously. This new output can be ignored > for the purpose?? of this test, so filter it all out. This will > allow the test to run on new and old reapir binaries. Oh well, I had promised faking up the new output for too long time but never managed to do it, so let's just put this one in. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs