[PATCH 0/3] xfstests: miscellaneous patches

[PATCH 0/3] xfstests: miscellaneous patches

[Dave Chinner]

I've been carrying the following patches in my workarea for some time now. I
figure I'm always applying them, so I might as well push them upstream.
The first makes 030 pass again by filtering out the additional verbose messages
that the latest repair has. The second adds more debug to test 222 so that if
it fails theres a better chance of working out what went wrong. The last
patch enables debian platforms to configure and compile dbtest and hence run
test 10.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

[PATCH 1/3] xfsqa: clean up 030 repair output

[Dave Chinner]

With the new checks in xfs_repair, it outputs more information
about errors found than previously. This new output can be ignored
for the purposeѕ of this test, so filter it all out. This will
allow the test to run on new and old reapir binaries.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
---
 common.repair |    5 +++++
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/common.repair b/common.repair
index ba42b8f..23a1ed6 100644
--- a/common.repair
+++ b/common.repair
@@ -72,6 +72,11 @@ s/        - generate realtime summary info and bitmap...\n//g;
 s/\s+- creating \d+ worker thread\(s\)\n//g;
 s/\s+- reporting progress in intervals of \d+ minutes\n//g;
 s/\s+- \d+:\d\d:\d\d:.*\n//g;
+# 3.1.0 extra accounting output
+/^agf_/ && next; # remove agf counts
+/^agi_/ && next; # remove agi counts
+/^sb_/ && next; # remove sb counts
+/^agi unlinked/ && next; # remove agi unlinked bucket warning
 	print;'
 }
 
-- 
1.5.6.5

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

[PATCH 2/3] xfsqa: keep xfs_fsr output around in test 222

[Dave Chinner]

From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

To confirm that xfs_fsr is doing the right thing, make it output debug
and verbose messages and store them in the 222.full file so that it
can be checked after the fact for correct operation.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
---
 222 |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/222 b/222
index 574c181..a65c845 100644
--- a/222
+++ b/222
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ _supported_os Linux
 
 [ "$XFS_FSR_PROG" = "" ] && _notrun "xfs_fsr not found"
 
-xfs_fsr $TEST_MNT > /dev/null 2>&1
+xfs_fsr -d -v $TEST_MNT > $seq.full 2>&1
 
 echo "--- silence is golden ---"
 status=0 ; exit
-- 
1.5.6.5

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

[PATCH 3/3] xfsqa: build dbtest on debian platforms

[Dave Chinner]

Set up autoconf to find the correct headers and compat libraries for
debian squeeze, and massage the includes to ensure the right headers get
included. Also fix a compile warning that was emitted now that it is being
compiled.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
---
 m4/package_gdbmdev.m4 |    8 ++++++--
 src/dbtest.c          |   18 +++++++++---------
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/m4/package_gdbmdev.m4 b/m4/package_gdbmdev.m4
index d826acd..6580fba 100644
--- a/m4/package_gdbmdev.m4
+++ b/m4/package_gdbmdev.m4
@@ -6,9 +6,13 @@ AC_DEFUN([AC_PACKAGE_WANT_NDBM],
   ])
 
 AC_DEFUN([AC_PACKAGE_WANT_GDBM],
-  [ AC_CHECK_HEADERS([gdbm/ndbm.h], [ have_db=true ], [ have_db=false ])
+  [ AC_CHECK_HEADERS([gdbm/ndbm.h, gdbm-ndbm.h], [ have_db=true ], [ have_db=false ])
+    libgdbm=""
+    if test $have_db = true -a -f ${libexecdir}${libdirsuffix}/libgdbm_compat.a; then
+	libgdbm="${libexecdir}${libdirsuffix}/libgdbm_compat.a"
+    fi
     if test $have_db = true -a -f ${libexecdir}${libdirsuffix}/libgdbm.a; then
-	libgdbm="${libexecdir}${libdirsuffix}/libgdbm.a"
+	libgdbm="${libgdbm} ${libexecdir}${libdirsuffix}/libgdbm.a"
     fi
     AC_SUBST(libgdbm)
     AC_SUBST(have_db)
diff --git a/src/dbtest.c b/src/dbtest.c
index 48667b7..297540f 100644
--- a/src/dbtest.c
+++ b/src/dbtest.c
@@ -18,19 +18,17 @@
  
 #include "global.h"
 
-#ifdef HAVE_GDBM_NDBM_H
+#ifdef HAVE_GDBM_NDBM_H_
 #include <gdbm/ndbm.h>
-#else
-#ifdef HAVE_GDBM_H
+#elif HAVE_GDBM_NDBM_H
+#include <gdbm-ndbm.h>
+#elif HAVE_GDBM_H
 #include <gdbm.h>
-#else
-#ifdef HAVE_NDBM_H
+#elif HAVE_NDBM_H
 #include <ndbm.h>
 #else
 bozo!
 #endif
-#endif
-#endif
 
 
 /* #define WorkDir	"/xfs" */
@@ -144,7 +142,8 @@ int InitDbmLookup(int howmany)
 		fflush(stdout);
 	}
 	dbm = dbm_open(filename, O_WRONLY|O_CREAT, 0644);
-	if(dbm == NULL) DoSysError("\ndbm_open", (int)dbm);
+	if(dbm == NULL)
+		DoSysError("\ndbm_open", -1);
 
 	if ((KeyArray = (unsigned short *)calloc( howmany,
 				sizeof(unsigned short))) == NULL)
@@ -195,7 +194,8 @@ int InitDbmLookup(int howmany)
 		fflush(stdout);
 	}
 	dbm = dbm_open(filename, O_RDONLY, 0);
-	if(dbm == NULL) DoSysError("\ndbm_open", (int)dbm);
+	if(dbm == NULL)
+		DoSysError("\ndbm_open", -1);
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.5.6.5

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfsqa: build dbtest on debian platforms

[Dave Chinner]

On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:16:26AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Set up autoconf to find the correct headers and compat libraries for
> debian squeeze, and massage the includes to ensure the right headers get
> included. Also fix a compile warning that was emitted now that it is being
> compiled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>

I missed a O_WRONLY->O_RDWR dbm_open fix (forgot to refresh the
patch before sending the patchbomb) in this, so it builds but
doesn't run.

Updated patch below.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

xfsqa: build dbtest on debian platforms

Set up autoconf to find the correct headers and compat libraries for
debian squeeze, and massage the includes to ensure the right headers get
included. Also fix a compile warning that was emitted now that it is being
compiled.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
---
 m4/package_gdbmdev.m4 |    8 ++++++--
 src/dbtest.c          |   24 ++++++++++++------------
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/m4/package_gdbmdev.m4 b/m4/package_gdbmdev.m4
index d826acd..6580fba 100644
--- a/m4/package_gdbmdev.m4
+++ b/m4/package_gdbmdev.m4
@@ -6,9 +6,13 @@ AC_DEFUN([AC_PACKAGE_WANT_NDBM],
   ])
 
 AC_DEFUN([AC_PACKAGE_WANT_GDBM],
-  [ AC_CHECK_HEADERS([gdbm/ndbm.h], [ have_db=true ], [ have_db=false ])
+  [ AC_CHECK_HEADERS([gdbm/ndbm.h, gdbm-ndbm.h], [ have_db=true ], [ have_db=false ])
+    libgdbm=""
+    if test $have_db = true -a -f ${libexecdir}${libdirsuffix}/libgdbm_compat.a; then
+	libgdbm="${libexecdir}${libdirsuffix}/libgdbm_compat.a"
+    fi
     if test $have_db = true -a -f ${libexecdir}${libdirsuffix}/libgdbm.a; then
-	libgdbm="${libexecdir}${libdirsuffix}/libgdbm.a"
+	libgdbm="${libgdbm} ${libexecdir}${libdirsuffix}/libgdbm.a"
     fi
     AC_SUBST(libgdbm)
     AC_SUBST(have_db)
diff --git a/src/dbtest.c b/src/dbtest.c
index 48667b7..ec8db0b 100644
--- a/src/dbtest.c
+++ b/src/dbtest.c
@@ -18,19 +18,17 @@
  
 #include "global.h"
 
-#ifdef HAVE_GDBM_NDBM_H
+#ifdef HAVE_GDBM_NDBM_H_
 #include <gdbm/ndbm.h>
-#else
-#ifdef HAVE_GDBM_H
+#elif HAVE_GDBM_NDBM_H
+#include <gdbm-ndbm.h>
+#elif HAVE_GDBM_H
 #include <gdbm.h>
-#else
-#ifdef HAVE_NDBM_H
+#elif HAVE_NDBM_H
 #include <ndbm.h>
 #else
 bozo!
 #endif
-#endif
-#endif
 
 
 /* #define WorkDir	"/xfs" */
@@ -140,11 +138,12 @@ int InitDbmLookup(int howmany)
 
 	sprintf(filename, "%s-%d", DBNAME, (int)getpid());
 	if (debugflg) {
-		printf("dbm_open(%s, O_WRONLY|O_CREAT, 0644)\n", filename);
+		printf("dbm_open(%s, O_RDWR|O_CREAT, 0644)\n", filename);
 		fflush(stdout);
 	}
-	dbm = dbm_open(filename, O_WRONLY|O_CREAT, 0644);
-	if(dbm == NULL) DoSysError("\ndbm_open", (int)dbm);
+	dbm = dbm_open(filename, O_RDWR|O_CREAT, 0644);
+	if(dbm == NULL)
+		DoSysError("\ndbm_open", -1);
 
 	if ((KeyArray = (unsigned short *)calloc( howmany,
 				sizeof(unsigned short))) == NULL)
@@ -191,11 +190,12 @@ int InitDbmLookup(int howmany)
 	}
 	dbm_close(dbm); /* close to eliminate chance of in-memory caching */
 	if (debugflg) {
-		printf("dbm_open(%s, O_RDNLY, 0)\n", filename);
+		printf("dbm_open(%s, O_RDONLY, 0)\n", filename);
 		fflush(stdout);
 	}
 	dbm = dbm_open(filename, O_RDONLY, 0);
-	if(dbm == NULL) DoSysError("\ndbm_open", (int)dbm);
+	if(dbm == NULL)
+		DoSysError("\ndbm_open", -1);
 	return 0;
 }
 

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfsqa: clean up 030 repair output

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:16:24AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> With the new checks in xfs_repair, it outputs more information
> about errors found than previously. This new output can be ignored
> for the purpose?? of this test, so filter it all out. This will
> allow the test to run on new and old reapir binaries.

Oh well, I had promised faking up the new output for too long time but
never managed to do it, so let's just put this one in.


Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfsqa: keep xfs_fsr output around in test 222

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:16:25AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> To confirm that xfs_fsr is doing the right thing, make it output debug
> and verbose messages and store them in the 222.full file so that it
> can be checked after the fact for correct operation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>


Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfsqa: build dbtest on debian platforms

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:16:26AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Set up autoconf to find the correct headers and compat libraries for
> debian squeeze, and massage the includes to ensure the right headers get
> included. Also fix a compile warning that was emitted now that it is being
> compiled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>

Ah, nice.  I've been trying to get this working on Debian off and on
again for years, but never got this far.


Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfsqa: build dbtest on debian platforms

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 04:49:43PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:16:26AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > Set up autoconf to find the correct headers and compat libraries for
> > debian squeeze, and massage the includes to ensure the right headers get
> > included. Also fix a compile warning that was emitted now that it is being
> > compiled.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
> 
> I missed a O_WRONLY->O_RDWR dbm_open fix (forgot to refresh the
> patch before sending the patchbomb) in this, so it builds but
> doesn't run.
> 
> Updated patch below.

Well, that needs some documentation in the patch description.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfsqa: build dbtest on debian platforms

[Christoph Hellwig]

Spoken too soon.  While this second patch at least compiles on my Debian
testing  system it doesn't link:

/tmp/ccWcHXtY.o: In function `CleanupDbmLookup': /root/xfstests-dev/src/dbtest.c:304: undefined reference to `dbm_close'
/tmp/ccWcHXtY.o: In function `DoDbmLookup':
/root/xfstests-dev/src/dbtest.c:220: undefined reference to `dbm_fetch'
/root/xfstests-dev/src/dbtest.c:264: undefined reference to `dbm_fetch' /tmp/ccWcHXtY.o: In function `InitDbmLookup':
/root/xfstests-dev/src/dbtest.c:144: undefined reference to `dbm_open'
/root/xfstests-dev/src/dbtest.c:178: undefined reference to `dbm_store'
/root/xfstests-dev/src/dbtest.c:191: undefined reference to `dbm_close'
/root/xfstests-dev/src/dbtest.c:196: undefined reference to `dbm_open'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [dbtest] Error 1
make[1]: *** [src] Error 2
make: *** [default] Error 2

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfsqa: build dbtest on debian platforms

[Dave Chinner]

On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 06:46:11AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Spoken too soon.  While this second patch at least compiles on my Debian
> testing  system it doesn't link:
> 
> /tmp/ccWcHXtY.o: In function `CleanupDbmLookup': /root/xfstests-dev/src/dbtest.c:304: undefined reference to `dbm_close'
> /tmp/ccWcHXtY.o: In function `DoDbmLookup':
> /root/xfstests-dev/src/dbtest.c:220: undefined reference to `dbm_fetch'
> /root/xfstests-dev/src/dbtest.c:264: undefined reference to `dbm_fetch' /tmp/ccWcHXtY.o: In function `InitDbmLookup':
> /root/xfstests-dev/src/dbtest.c:144: undefined reference to `dbm_open'
> /root/xfstests-dev/src/dbtest.c:178: undefined reference to `dbm_store'
> /root/xfstests-dev/src/dbtest.c:191: undefined reference to `dbm_close'
> /root/xfstests-dev/src/dbtest.c:196: undefined reference to `dbm_open'
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[2]: *** [dbtest] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [src] Error 2
> make: *** [default] Error 2

Where is libgdbm-compat on your system?

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfsqa: build dbtest on debian platforms

[Alex Elder]

On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 11:26 +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 06:46:11AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Spoken too soon.  While this second patch at least compiles on my Debian
> > testing  system it doesn't link:
> > 
> > /tmp/ccWcHXtY.o: In function `CleanupDbmLookup': /root/xfstests-dev/src/dbtest.c:304: undefined reference to `dbm_close'
> > /tmp/ccWcHXtY.o: In function `DoDbmLookup':
> > /root/xfstests-dev/src/dbtest.c:220: undefined reference to `dbm_fetch'
> > /root/xfstests-dev/src/dbtest.c:264: undefined reference to `dbm_fetch' /tmp/ccWcHXtY.o: In function `InitDbmLookup':
> > /root/xfstests-dev/src/dbtest.c:144: undefined reference to `dbm_open'
> > /root/xfstests-dev/src/dbtest.c:178: undefined reference to `dbm_store'
> > /root/xfstests-dev/src/dbtest.c:191: undefined reference to `dbm_close'
> > /root/xfstests-dev/src/dbtest.c:196: undefined reference to `dbm_open'
> > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> > make[2]: *** [dbtest] Error 1
> > make[1]: *** [src] Error 2
> > make: *** [default] Error 2
> 
> Where is libgdbm-compat on your system?

I think we need to do a better job of defining what's required
for this stuff--building and running.  I know I had trouble
the first time I set things up, and now that it works I
have no recollection of the stuff that I did.  It would be
good to make it easier for people to get testing going,
we might get more people actually running them in a wider
variety of environments.

					-Alex

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfsqa: build dbtest on debian platforms

[Eric Sandeen]

Alex Elder wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 11:26 +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 06:46:11AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> Spoken too soon.  While this second patch at least compiles on my Debian
>>> testing  system it doesn't link:
>>>
>>> /tmp/ccWcHXtY.o: In function `CleanupDbmLookup': /root/xfstests-dev/src/dbtest.c:304: undefined reference to `dbm_close'
>>> /tmp/ccWcHXtY.o: In function `DoDbmLookup':
>>> /root/xfstests-dev/src/dbtest.c:220: undefined reference to `dbm_fetch'
>>> /root/xfstests-dev/src/dbtest.c:264: undefined reference to `dbm_fetch' /tmp/ccWcHXtY.o: In function `InitDbmLookup':
>>> /root/xfstests-dev/src/dbtest.c:144: undefined reference to `dbm_open'
>>> /root/xfstests-dev/src/dbtest.c:178: undefined reference to `dbm_store'
>>> /root/xfstests-dev/src/dbtest.c:191: undefined reference to `dbm_close'
>>> /root/xfstests-dev/src/dbtest.c:196: undefined reference to `dbm_open'
>>> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>>> make[2]: *** [dbtest] Error 1
>>> make[1]: *** [src] Error 2
>>> make: *** [default] Error 2
>> Where is libgdbm-compat on your system?
> 
> I think we need to do a better job of defining what's required
> for this stuff--building and running.  I know I had trouble
> the first time I set things up, and now that it works I
> have no recollection of the stuff that I did.  It would be
> good to make it easier for people to get testing going,
> we might get more people actually running them in a wider
> variety of environments.

Making missing stuff gracefully handled runtime helps...

I also have a hacked up rpm for this, that way package dependencies
take care of it all seamlessly:

BuildRequires:  autoconf, libtool, xfsprogs-devel, e2fsprogs-devel
BuildRequires:  libacl-devel, libattr-devel, libaio-devel
Requires:       bash, xfsprogs, xfsdump, perl, acl, attr, bind-utils
Requires:       bc, indent, quota

If I just knew a decent place to drop the stuff that was compliant
with fs hierarchy rules, I'd toss it into fedora, and debian might
not be far behind ...

-Eric

> 					-Alex
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
> 

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfsqa: build dbtest on debian platforms

[Dave Chinner]

On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 09:28:40PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 11:26 +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 06:46:11AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Spoken too soon.  While this second patch at least compiles on my Debian
> > > testing  system it doesn't link:
> > > 
> > > /tmp/ccWcHXtY.o: In function `CleanupDbmLookup': /root/xfstests-dev/src/dbtest.c:304: undefined reference to `dbm_close'
> > > /tmp/ccWcHXtY.o: In function `DoDbmLookup':
> > > /root/xfstests-dev/src/dbtest.c:220: undefined reference to `dbm_fetch'
> > > /root/xfstests-dev/src/dbtest.c:264: undefined reference to `dbm_fetch' /tmp/ccWcHXtY.o: In function `InitDbmLookup':
> > > /root/xfstests-dev/src/dbtest.c:144: undefined reference to `dbm_open'
> > > /root/xfstests-dev/src/dbtest.c:178: undefined reference to `dbm_store'
> > > /root/xfstests-dev/src/dbtest.c:191: undefined reference to `dbm_close'
> > > /root/xfstests-dev/src/dbtest.c:196: undefined reference to `dbm_open'
> > > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> > > make[2]: *** [dbtest] Error 1
> > > make[1]: *** [src] Error 2
> > > make: *** [default] Error 2
> > 
> > Where is libgdbm-compat on your system?
> 
> I think we need to do a better job of defining what's required
> for this stuff--building and running.

autoconf is supposed to handle that. If you don't have a critical
package, autoconf will fail and ask you to install it. For
non-critical packages or libraries, it just compiles it out.  The
above error indicates that my autoconf changes are not detecting the
libgdbm_compat library correctly (no surprise, I just hacked a hack
to make it work on my system) so once that is sorted dbtest won't
even be built unless the libraries are installed and detected.

FWIW, Christoph, does the problem go away with a 'make distclean;
make'?

> I know I had trouble the first time I set things up, and now that
> it works I have no recollection of the stuff that I did.  It would
> be good to make it easier for people to get testing going, we
> might get more people actually running them in a wider variety of
> environments.

A real source package for xfstests is the right way to do this, I
think. That way installing the package can pull in the correct
dependencies before you try to build it. There's only so much we
can do if all you do is a git clone to install it...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfsqa: build dbtest on debian platforms

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 06:55:11PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> autoconf is supposed to handle that. If you don't have a critical
> package, autoconf will fail and ask you to install it. For
> non-critical packages or libraries, it just compiles it out.  The
> above error indicates that my autoconf changes are not detecting the
> libgdbm_compat library correctly (no surprise, I just hacked a hack
> to make it work on my system) so once that is sorted dbtest won't
> even be built unless the libraries are installed and detected.
> 
> FWIW, Christoph, does the problem go away with a 'make distclean;
> make'?

Yes, that fixes it and now I can run 010.

Thanks!

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfsqa: build dbtest on debian platforms

[Alex Elder]

On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 12:39 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 06:55:11PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > autoconf is supposed to handle that. If you don't have a critical
> > package, autoconf will fail and ask you to install it. For
> > non-critical packages or libraries, it just compiles it out.  The
> > above error indicates that my autoconf changes are not detecting the
> > libgdbm_compat library correctly (no surprise, I just hacked a hack
> > to make it work on my system) so once that is sorted dbtest won't
> > even be built unless the libraries are installed and detected.
> > 
> > FWIW, Christoph, does the problem go away with a 'make distclean;
> > make'?
> 
> Yes, that fixes it and now I can run 010.
> 
> Thanks!
> 

OK, I'm about to mark the original post "Reviewed".

Meanwhile I think we should discuss packing, but I'll start
that discussion in a separate message.

					-Alex

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs