From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o3UGhb4D174009 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:43:37 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id E343F1DE0E42 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:45:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id kSybrwqyGRb0mlaK for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:45:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 12:45:43 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] xfs: be more explicit if RT mount fails due to config Message-ID: <20100430164543.GA4753@infradead.org> References: <4BDA54A4.3040204@sandeen.net> <20100430164002.GC14107@infradead.org> <4BDB08C4.6070900@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BDB08C4.6070900@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs-oss On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:43:48AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Recent testers were slightly confused that a realtime > mount failed due to missing CONFIG_XFS_RT; we can make > that a little more obvious. > > V2: drop the else as suggested by Christoph > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs