public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] xfs: delayed logging
Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 09:54:01 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100506235401.GD19579@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100506191218.GA18555@infradead.org>

On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 03:12:18PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Secondly, for delayed logging only, matching by transaction
> > structure address triggers the failure because busy extents
> > have a much longer life than the transaction structure. It is clear
> > why the transaction ID matching didn't trip over - it would have
> > triggered a log force in this situation, and hence blocked until
> > the checkpoint that fs_mark-2742 had triggered was complete before
> > redoing the rbtree insert.
> 
> True, the busy extents get spliced over to the cil context, so they
> outlive the transaction structure.
> 
> > Right now I'm simply going to go back to using the transaction ID
> > for matching transactions, even though the above analysis points out
> > that even that is not as efficient as it could be for delayed
> > logging. That is, we don't even need to force the log or have a
> > synchronous transaction if the extent was first freed in the current
> > checkpoint seqeunce. Doing that, however, requires pinning the
> > checkpoint sequence (i.e. preventing a flush) until the current
> > transaction commits. While that is in the plan for delayed logging,
> > it is future functionality and hence I'm not going to attempt to
> > design and implement it this close to 2.6.35-rc cycle. [*]
> 
> Sounds fine to me.  I'm not a fan of exporting the tid, but it
> seems like there's no good way around it for now.  Please make the
> tid exporting a separate changeset so that it's easily revertable
> once this is sorted out.

Yeah, that's a good idea.

> And documenting all this in comments in the code so that it's archived
> would be very useful!

Will do. 

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

      reply	other threads:[~2010-05-06 23:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-06  1:45 [PATCH 0/11] xfs: delayed logging Dave Chinner
2010-05-06  1:45 ` [PATCH 01/11] xfs: Don't reuse the same transaciton ID for duplicated transactions Dave Chinner
2010-05-06 20:41   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-05-06  1:45 ` [PATCH 02/11] xfs: Improve scalability of busy extent tracking Dave Chinner
2010-05-06  1:45 ` [PATCH 03/11] xfs: allow log ticket allocation to take allocation flags Dave Chinner
2010-05-06 20:43   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-05-06  1:45 ` [PATCH 04/11] xfs: modify buffer item reference counting V2 Dave Chinner
2010-05-06 21:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-05-06  1:45 ` [PATCH 05/11] xfs: Clean up XFS_BLI_* flag namespace Dave Chinner
2010-05-06 20:51   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-05-06  1:45 ` [PATCH 06/11] xfs: clean up log ticket overrun debug output Dave Chinner
2010-05-06 20:50   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-05-06  1:45 ` [PATCH 07/11] xfs: Delayed logging design documentation Dave Chinner
2010-05-06  1:45 ` [PATCH 08/11] xfs: Introduce delayed logging core code Dave Chinner
2010-05-06  1:45 ` [PATCH 09/11] xfs: forced unmounts need to push the CIL Dave Chinner
2010-05-06  1:45 ` [PATCH 10/11] xfs: enable background pushing of " Dave Chinner
2010-05-06  1:45 ` [PATCH 11/11] xfs: Ensure inode allocation buffers are fully replayed Dave Chinner
2010-05-06 13:26 ` [PATCH 0/11] xfs: delayed logging Dave Chinner
2010-05-06 19:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-05-06 23:54     ` Dave Chinner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100506235401.GD19579@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox