From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o4KExPeR211697 for ; Thu, 20 May 2010 09:59:25 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 40506156FE74 for ; Thu, 20 May 2010 08:02:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 91ClL4T5ejKykLsY for ; Thu, 20 May 2010 08:02:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 11:01:42 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] xfstests: test extent size hints Message-ID: <20100520150141.GA27124@infradead.org> References: <1274276289-8839-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> <1274276289-8839-2-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1274276289-8839-2-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Jan Kara Cc: hch@infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com I think you included one patch too many in your series, this was already applied. Btw, if you have this in a git tree making that available would ease testing a bit. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs