From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o4QEpEdK083996 for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 09:51:14 -0500 Received: from mailsrv14.zmi.at (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 3FDE2A4C8C3 for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 07:55:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailsrv14.zmi.at (mailsrv1.zmi.at [212.69.164.54]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 6pNhXzy7grrqtBIA for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 07:55:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailsrv.i.zmi.at (h081217106033.dyn.cm.kabsi.at [81.217.106.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailsrv2.i.zmi.at", Issuer "power4u.zmi.at" (not verified)) by mailsrv14.zmi.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 91ADC800184 for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 16:53:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from saturn.localnet (saturn.i.zmi.at [10.72.27.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mailsrv.i.zmi.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 509DC83C804 for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 16:53:34 +0200 (CEST) From: Michael Monnerie Subject: Re: noatime,nodiratime? Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 16:53:33 +0200 References: <4BF3F212.5030600@hardwarefreak.com> <4BF44105.4040902@sandeen.net> <4BF47859.6020808@hardwarefreak.com> In-Reply-To: <4BF47859.6020808@hardwarefreak.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201005261653.33774@zmi.at> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3897573994818107245==" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com --===============3897573994818107245== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4048424.WqApMMQSJU"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --nextPart4048424.WqApMMQSJU Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Donnerstag, 20. Mai 2010 Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Yes. It would be nice to see the settings regardless of default or > user defined. =20 I second that. Because you could use barrier in the fstab options, but=20 it's not supported and so nobarrier is used. It would be good to check=20 that by simply "cat /proc/mounts". =2D-=20 mit freundlichen Gr=FCssen, Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc it-management Internet Services http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee] Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 // Wir haben im Moment zwei H=E4user zu verkaufen: // http://zmi.at/langegg/ // http://zmi.at/haus2009/ --nextPart4048424.WqApMMQSJU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkv9Ne0ACgkQzhSR9xwSCbRKsgCeNgdBYWAPxzSg8QL/GKFx8UY6 hIkAoKZq1bhFl4LbunRflC5kfI0i3qxN =ORl0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4048424.WqApMMQSJU-- --===============3897573994818107245== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs --===============3897573994818107245==--