From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o4RGS0nO145410 for ; Thu, 27 May 2010 11:28:00 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id C499214542D5 for ; Thu, 27 May 2010 09:30:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id l5iIbko8wYHUSGwm for ; Thu, 27 May 2010 09:30:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 12:30:24 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] Test basic quota enforcement Message-ID: <20100527163024.GA18771@infradead.org> References: <1274710459-11446-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> <1274710459-11446-4-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> <20100525100635.GA21252@infradead.org> <20100525203914.GE3783@quack.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100525203914.GE3783@quack.suse.cz> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Jan Kara Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:39:15PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > On Tue 25-05-10 06:06:35, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 04:14:14PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > > Add a test which checks whether basic quota enforcement works. > > > > This one fails for me when testing and xfs filesystem on latest Linus' > > tree (with Debian -testing userspace): > OK, I've committed a fixed version of the test to the repository. Thanks, I've pulled your updated tree. Btw, your kernel.org xfstests tree is not a bare repo which will increase the load in the kernel.org servers needlessly. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs