From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o525Bvgh052179 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 00:11:57 -0500 Received: from mail.internode.on.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id EC5DD1B15F6E for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 22:14:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.internode.on.net (bld-mail15.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.100]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id iutwIblgCFOLrJs9 for ; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 22:14:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 15:14:21 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/17] xfs: merge iop_unpin_remove into iop_unpin Message-ID: <20100602051421.GG7011@dastard> References: <20100531160727.842750532@bombadil.infradead.org> <20100531160900.602159529@bombadil.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100531160900.602159529@bombadil.infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:07:34PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > The unpin_remove item operation instances always share most of the > implementation with the respective unpin implementation. So instead > of keeping two different entry points add a remove flag to the unpin > operation and share the code more easily. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs