From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o59DN5mJ015990 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 08:23:07 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 74785158FF1C for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 06:28:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 0ziie5tdtcCRRdLS for ; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 06:28:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 09:25:36 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests 217: remove file in between mkfs's Message-ID: <20100609132536.GA31729@infradead.org> References: <4C0F0A4C.7050600@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C0F0A4C.7050600@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: xfs-oss On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 10:28:12PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > 217 requires a 2G scratch: > > _require_fs_space $SCRATCH_MNT 2202000 > > but as we mkfs different sizes, we actually are filling in the > sparse loopback more and more, and 3.8G isn't enough to contain it. > > If we remove & recreate the file between mkfs's it doesn't take > so much space ... I don't think it adds significantly to test time. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs