From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o5L7Jamf110255 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 02:19:36 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 29D7E151077E for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 00:22:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id fHGABwUgyHnFIwah for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 00:22:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 03:22:16 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] xfs: remove block number from inode lookup code Message-ID: <20100621072216.GE1361@infradead.org> References: <1277078341-19087-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1277078341-19087-5-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1277078341-19087-5-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: security@kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 09:59:01AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner > > The block number comes from bulkstat based inode lookups to shortcut > the mapping calculations. We ar enot able to trust anything from > bulkstat, so drop the block number as well so that the correct > lookups and mappings are always done. Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs