From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o5NADesW018807 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 05:13:40 -0500 Received: from mailsrv14.zmi.at (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 0A07114AE620 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 03:20:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailsrv14.zmi.at (mailsrv1.zmi.at [212.69.164.54]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id nAFXF54qEU2CXcRF for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 03:20:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailsrv.i.zmi.at (h081217106033.dyn.cm.kabsi.at [81.217.106.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailsrv2.i.zmi.at", Issuer "power4u.zmi.at" (not verified)) by mailsrv14.zmi.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3756D17E for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:16:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from saturn.localnet (saturn.i.zmi.at [10.72.27.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mailsrv.i.zmi.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E53A083C828 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:15:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Michael Monnerie Subject: Re: XFS peculiar behavior Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:16:18 +0200 References: <4C21B9AF.9010307@ics.forth.gr> In-Reply-To: <4C21B9AF.9010307@ics.forth.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201006231216.18514@zmi.at> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1697247889793324755==" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com --===============1697247889793324755== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2530792.x7bXYLASVb"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --nextPart2530792.x7bXYLASVb Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mittwoch, 23. Juni 2010 Yannis Klonatos wrote: > The problem is that i have noticed that XFS may - not all times=20 > - split a table over a large disk distance. =20 Interesting. I have no idea why this happens and would be interested in=20 investigation too. As a quick help, maybe using allocsize=3D1G in the xfs mount options would= =20 help? How many AGs does the filesystem have?=20 And which version of mkfs.xfs do you use? Newer xfsprogs create the disk with 4 AGs per default, maybe that=20 influences the allocation order? =2D-=20 mit freundlichen Gr=FCssen, Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc it-management Internet Services http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee] Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 // Wir haben im Moment zwei H=E4user zu verkaufen: // http://zmi.at/langegg/ // http://zmi.at/haus2009/ --nextPart2530792.x7bXYLASVb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkwh3vIACgkQzhSR9xwSCbRWOQCcCcwPVMcTPkN6Jf8QIO8qL9bp 7K4AnijlonxfWFryde24uKG6WXtPzpWJ =Q0eC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2530792.x7bXYLASVb-- --===============1697247889793324755== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs --===============1697247889793324755==--