From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o5TND2Ix097068 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:13:02 -0500 Received: from mail.internode.on.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 25FCB4193F4 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 16:15:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.internode.on.net (bld-mail14.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.99]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id UOvi5wBs2CbrCOHN for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 16:15:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 09:15:43 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: XFS and Extended ACLs Message-ID: <20100629231543.GC6590@dastard> References: <001636458d40cae4e1048a2bf4e9@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001636458d40cae4e1048a2bf4e9@google.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: nailman23@gmail.com Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 02:21:42PM +0000, nailman23@gmail.com wrote: > Hi All, > > I have an issue with extended ACLs. The situation is as follows: > 1) There are two users (UserA and UserB) > 2) They belong to the same group (users) > 3) The SAMBA share called "test" has user access enabled for UserA and UserB > 4) The UserA creates test.docx file on the "test" share and he > becomes the owner of the file. > 5) Then UserB edits the test.docx file and save changes. After that > UserB becomes the owner. It is not an issue because when editing the > file Word creates new temporary file and then, during saving, > overwrites the original file. The issue is when you check ACLs entry > you will see that UserA has his own ACLs entries, although he > already belongs to the "users" groups. > > This occurs when the share has XFS file system in the bottom. > > Then I have created an ext3 file system on the logical volume and > after performing all steps, the UserB was owner of the file, but the > UserA was no longer listed in ACLs entries. Can you provide a script that demonstrates the problem? > It seems the issue comes from XFS and the way as the XFS handles the > ACLs permissions. XFS uses the most of the generic code for getting and setting ACLs, so there shouldn't be any difference unless there is a bug or you are using an old kernel. What kernel are you running? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs