From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o69G9e6h122030 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 11:09:41 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 67FA2BA1B4F for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 09:18:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id t2uwC1pkZM4UXdi2 for ; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 09:18:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 12:12:32 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH xfstests] _qmount: mount w/o selinux xattrs Message-ID: <20100709161232.GA26302@infradead.org> References: <4C2CF34F.7070008@redhat.com> <20100702071006.GB30776@infradead.org> <4C2E2687.3080700@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C2E2687.3080700@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs mailing list On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 12:48:55PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > What about just disabling selinux for all filesystems instead of just > > XFS for the general case. > > Well it seems like if we -can- test with it on, that's good. > Certain distros ship with it on by default, so exercising lots > of scenarios with it on seems beneficial... It seems, but I'd rather do it consistently for all filesystems. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs