From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o6G5KWWe246111 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 00:20:32 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id CC69D44F726 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 22:23:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id PLLsMwWAvUeWT7Je for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 22:23:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 01:23:29 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] xfs: reclaim bug fixes Message-ID: <20100716052329.GF29915@infradead.org> References: <1279154300-2018-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1279154300-2018-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:38:15AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > The following patches fix excessive CPU consumption during inode > cache shrinking when filesystems have lots of allocation groups as > well as prevent a couple of lockdep reports that were found during > testing. Also included is a fix for a reclaim recursion deadlock > when allocating memory during inode initialisation. Wa the overlap of patch 1 with the for-2.6.35 shrinker series intentional? In addition to patch 1 patches 3 to 5 are also for-2.6.35 material in my opinion. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs