public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@is.it-management.at>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: rsync and corrupt inodes (was xfs_dump problem)
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:40:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201007161640.39721@zmi.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100715225713.GK30737@dastard>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1174 bytes --]

On Freitag, 16. Juli 2010 Dave Chinner wrote:
> > CFLAGS=-march=athlon64-sse3 ./configure --prefix=/usr

> Drop the CFLAGS and see what happens when you just use a generic
> arch target.

I investigated this a bit more, and I'm sure that CFLAGS get completely 
ignored. I even set all variables with "GCC" in config.status to random 
content, and it compiles. Then I found that the one in include/builddefs 
gets always set to this:
GCCFLAGS = -funsigned-char -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall

So I changed it manually:
GCCFLAGS = -march=athlon64-sse3 -g -Os -funsigned-char -fno-strict-
aliasing -Wall
and now the resulting binary is different. I guess that should not be 
happening? I'm used to setting "CFLAGS=" during configure to have 
smaller bins, and CFLAGS normally get passed through during compile, but 
not with xfsprogs. Not that it's very important, but maybe worth a fix?

-- 
mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc

it-management Internet Services
http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee]
Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31

// Wir haben im Moment zwei Häuser zu verkaufen:
// http://zmi.at/langegg/
// http://zmi.at/haus2009/

[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-07-16 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-15 20:58 rsync and corrupt inodes (was xfs_dump problem) Michael Monnerie
2010-07-15 22:57 ` Dave Chinner
2010-07-16 14:17   ` Michael Monnerie
2010-07-16 14:40   ` Michael Monnerie [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-06-27  1:10 WARNING xfsdump [still] Cannot allocate memory for list of [root|non-root] attributes for nondir ino xxyz Linda A. Walsh
2010-06-28  2:27 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-29 22:33   ` xfs file system in process of becoming corrupt; though xfs_repair thinks it's fine! ; -/ (was xfs_dump problem...) Linda Walsh
2010-06-30 18:25     ` Michael Monnerie
2010-06-30 23:30       ` rsync and corrupt inodes (was xfs_dump problem) Dave Chinner
2010-07-01  8:25         ` Michael Monnerie
2010-07-02  2:42           ` Dave Chinner
2010-07-02  6:21             ` Michael Monnerie
2010-07-04 22:53               ` Dave Chinner
2010-07-12 11:28                 ` Michael Monnerie
2010-07-07 21:56         ` Linda Walsh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201007161640.39721@zmi.at \
    --to=michael.monnerie@is.it-management.at \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox