From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o6KFOUUm027314 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 10:24:30 -0500 Received: from smtp4-g21.free.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id D29AC45BE83 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:27:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp4-g21.free.fr (smtp4-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.4]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id C0xkfv5paH3uxfBD for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:27:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harpe.intellique.com (unknown [82.225.196.72]) by smtp4-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E28D74C8135 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:27:21 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:27:04 +0200 From: Emmanuel Florac Subject: Re: Calculating swidth On A RAID6 Volume Message-ID: <20100720172704.609477f4@harpe.intellique.com> In-Reply-To: <201007201700.51977@zmi.at> References: <3C5E029826A0704DB5998577FCFF46F0094DA1AD69@dagobah> <4C45AF09.5090901@dermichi.com> <20100720164444.4c1cef88@harpe.intellique.com> <201007201700.51977@zmi.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1471702551788650080==" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com --===============1471702551788650080== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/HfhqCnERkX6B_ADCKUdN35z"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --Sig_/HfhqCnERkX6B_ADCKUdN35z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:00:51 +0200 Michael Monnerie =E9crivait: > I'd say using su+sw is more future proof than swidth+sunit, as 4K > sector drives will become standard, and then using 512B units will be > outdated anyway, right? Absolutely, and furthermore I'm wondering what's happening in the case where the drives have 4096 bytes blocks; I suppose then sunit should be expressed as a number of 4096 bytes blocks, and what about swidth ? the hell if I know :) This is also probably a nice little nest of coming filesystem bugs to be hatched :=3D) --=20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique | Intellique | | +33 1 78 94 84 02 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --Sig_/HfhqCnERkX6B_ADCKUdN35z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkxFwEgACgkQX3jQXNUicVYDrwCgheXbfu1DLRUqWzRHKbhFQJI3 Z78An0Z7f0RNcERCTNVREiQi/5n2Zusk =I2r7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/HfhqCnERkX6B_ADCKUdN35z-- --===============1471702551788650080== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs --===============1471702551788650080==--