From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o6N6DKIh185783 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 01:13:21 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 7E78A1B8EEA1 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 23:16:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id sYzNS2cyXIjZxjoW for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 23:16:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 02:16:07 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: xfsprogs: CFLAGS not passed in Message-ID: <20100723061607.GA423@infradead.org> References: <201007220821.44314@zmi.at> <20100722222900.GB32635@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100722222900.GB32635@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Michael Monnerie , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 08:29:00AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > The OPTIMIZER compile options are still included here, so there's > potential conflict just by dumbly initialising CFLAGS.... Given that gcc always takes the latests of a set of conflicting option just aqdding the flags from configure last should fix it. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs