From: Matthias Schniedermeyer <ms@citd.de>
To: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@intellique.com>
Cc: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: 4k sector drives
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:13:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100723141341.GA3727@citd.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100723155034.2a42ccd7@harpe.intellique.com>
On 23.07.2010 15:50, Emmanuel Florac wrote:
> Le Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:38:43 +0200
> Matthias Schniedermeyer <ms@citd.de> écrivait:
>
> > Only for writes, reads are for practically unaffected.
>
> Sequential writes may be relatively unaffected too; if you write
> sequentially a couple of megabytes you'll have only a couple of
> additional blocks at the beginning and end of operation.
What MAY hurt, also for large writes, are the meta-data operations while
writing the file. (e.g. the file-size changes, journaling ...)
But i haven't tested that and can't say for sure how much that hurts.
Bis denn
--
Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as
bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer
wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated,
cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-23 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-21 10:33 4k sector drives Khelben Blackstaff
2010-07-21 12:21 ` Michael Monnerie
2010-07-23 6:09 ` Michael Monnerie
2010-07-23 9:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-23 10:42 ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-07-23 10:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-23 12:41 ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-07-23 10:59 ` Michael Monnerie
2010-07-23 12:56 ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-07-23 13:10 ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-07-23 13:38 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2010-07-23 13:50 ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-07-23 14:13 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer [this message]
2010-07-24 8:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-24 21:07 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-07-24 22:35 ` Michael Monnerie
2010-07-25 15:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-07-23 15:02 Khelben Blackstaff
2010-07-23 15:28 ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-07-23 9:19 Khelben Blackstaff
2010-07-21 7:53 Khelben Blackstaff
2010-07-21 9:14 ` Michael Monnerie
2010-07-21 10:33 ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-07-20 18:58 Michael Monnerie
2010-07-20 20:30 ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-07-20 20:39 ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-07-20 21:34 ` Michael Monnerie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100723141341.GA3727@citd.de \
--to=ms@citd.de \
--cc=eflorac@intellique.com \
--cc=stan@hardwarefreak.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox