public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@is.it-management.at>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: bug and fun with XFS: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:18:59 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100726001859.GD655@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201007260019.51568@zmi.at>

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:19:47AM +0200, Michael Monnerie wrote:
> I just enjoy an obviously broken XFS filesystem. It was a running 
> server, which I planned to migrate so I did "rsync -aHAX / 
> otherhost::rsyncmodule", and experienced a "killed". At that time I 
> thought it was a one time mistake, so restarted rsync, but Murphy made 
> it get killed again.
> 
> So I looked into dmesg, just to find this: It's the log of all messages, 
> so maybe twice the same, I copy everything for reference. See attachment 
> "xfs-bug.dmesg.txt".

The first occurrence is:

> Pid: 1809, comm: syslog-ng Not tainted 2.6.27.48-0.1-xen #1

That's an old kernel, and doesn't seem related to the rsync
triggered problem, even though it is the same oops signature.

> I started to look, and quickly found a funny problem: Once I mount that 
> partition, I cannot unmount it again:
> 
> # mount /disks/work/
> # umount /disks/work/
> umount: /disks/work: device is busy.
>         (In some cases useful info about processes that use
>          the device is found by lsof(8) or fuser(1))

Some other process has taken a reference to the fs, I'd say.
And if that process triggered an oops, then you'd see this.

> So I rebooted without mounting that partition, and 
> 
> # xfs_repair -n /dev/xvda2 [VERSION:3.1.2]
> xfs_repair: /lib64/libuuid.so.1: no version information available 
> (required by xfs_repair)                                                                                                                                          
> Phase 1 - find and verify superblock...                                                                                                                                                                                             
> Phase 2 - using internal log                                                                                                                                                                                                        
>         - scan filesystem freespace and inode maps...                                                                                                                                                                               
>         - found root inode chunk
> Phase 3 - for each AG...
>         - scan (but don't clear) agi unlinked lists...
>         - process known inodes and perform inode discovery...
>         - agno = 0
>         - agno = 1
> local inode 8636461 attr too small (size = 0, min size = 4)
> bad attribute fork in inode 8636461, would clear attr fork
> would have cleared inode 8636461

Corrupt attribute fork - matches with the oops signatures.  I'd
definitely consider upgrading your kernel as a first step...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-26  0:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-25 22:19 bug and fun with XFS: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference Michael Monnerie
2010-07-26  0:18 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2010-07-26  5:52   ` permanent kernel upgrading (was: bug and fun with XFS: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference) Michael Monnerie
2010-07-26  7:17     ` Dave Chinner
2010-07-26  8:43       ` Michael Monnerie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100726001859.GD655@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=michael.monnerie@is.it-management.at \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox