From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o6S8f7sS240724 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 03:41:10 -0500 Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 04:44:00 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: XFS Master Branch Rebase Message-ID: <20100728084400.GA9516@infradead.org> References: <1280247366.2002.111.camel@doink> <20100727232719.GR7362@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100727232719.GR7362@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, Alex Elder On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 09:27:19AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > Alex, this is a bit annoying. Rebases are a real pain for anyone > downstream that is using git in non-trivial ways. FYI: I asked Alex to do it, so I'll happily take all the blaim here. The real problem is that we had quite a merge mess before, which Linus absolutely doesn't like. And if I traced it back correctly most of it actually came from the xfsdev tree. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs