From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o592po1R037938 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 21:51:51 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 77ACB13357D8 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:37:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id toM1WCI60NNsNCLR for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:37:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:29:43 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: filesystem shrinks after using xfs_repair Message-ID: <20100730102943.GA24106@infradead.org> References: <20100726034545.GE655@dastard> <20100730091554.2c9ca1ec@galadriel.home> <20100730075746.GA20444@infradead.org> <201007301223.12134@zmi.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201007301223.12134@zmi.at> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Michael Monnerie Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 12:23:08PM +0200, Michael Monnerie wrote: > On Freitag, 30. Juli 2010 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Recent enough kernel work fine with filesystems that inode64 was used > > on even if it's not specified anymore. > > Really? Since when exactly? That would be a nice feature. If we can > define it clearly, I could put that on the FAQ. Linux 2.6.35 will be the first kernel with the bugfixes for this to work. > But how does it truncate the numbers >int32 and avoid collisions? It doesn't. Existing inodes won't nessecarily fit into 32-bits, but no new inodes above it will be allocated. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs