From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o75J6OOq098876 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 14:06:24 -0500 Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 6DDFD1E40383 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 12:06:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com (rcsinet10.oracle.com [148.87.113.121]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id VFGD2Xl3XjCNxWSH for ; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 12:06:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 15:01:38 -0400 From: Chris Mason Subject: Re: direct-io regression [Was: How to track down abysmal performance ata - raid1 - crypto - vg/lv - xfs] Message-ID: <20100805190138.GV29846@think> References: <20100804085039.GA11671@infradead.org> <20100804091317.GA27779@isilmar-3.linta.de> <20100804092122.GA2998@infradead.org> <20100804073546.GA7494@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> <201008041116.09822@zmi.at> <20100804102526.GB13766@isilmar-3.linta.de> <15446.1280953986@localhost> <20100805093100.GA3001@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> <20100805113240.GA29846@think> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Jeff Moyer Cc: Michael Monnerie , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dominik Brodowski , xfs@oss.sgi.com, Christoph Hellwig , dm-devel@redhat.com, josef@redhat.com On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 02:58:37PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote: > Chris Mason writes: > > > But, I'm surprised your drive is doing 8K dio reads at 16MB/s, that > > seems a little high. > > I'm not sure why you think that. We're talking about a plain old SATA > disk, right? I can get 40-50MB/s on my systems for 8KB O_DIRECT reads. > What am I missing? Clearly I'm wrong, his drive is going much faster ;) I expect the smaller reads to be slower but the drive's internal cache is doing well. -chris _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs