From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o7BMV1rv165700 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:31:02 -0500 Received: from mailsrv14.zmi.at (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 266F5C9D9CA for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:40:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailsrv14.zmi.at (mailsrv1.zmi.at [212.69.164.54]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id DOFcOyckcjhVQXg5 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:40:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailsrv.i.zmi.at (h081217106033.dyn.cm.kabsi.at [81.217.106.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailsrv2.i.zmi.at", Issuer "power4u.zmi.at" (not verified)) by mailsrv14.zmi.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 63C03703 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 00:31:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from saturn.localnet (saturn.i.zmi.at [10.72.27.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mailsrv.i.zmi.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2B2FE401C2E for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 00:31:22 +0200 (CEST) From: Michael Monnerie Subject: Re: observed significant performance improvement using "delaylog" in a real-world application Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 00:31:21 +0200 References: <201008111428.31196@zmi.at> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201008120031.21682@zmi.at> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4153623471444682869==" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com --===============4153623471444682869== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2733270.f5vIWqtFvQ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --nextPart2733270.f5vIWqtFvQ Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mittwoch, 11. August 2010 Peter Niemayer wrote: > I think after the "ext2"-age no serious file system ever had > a real problem dealing with lots of files in one directory - > or do you have contradicting information? =20 IIRC 2010 there was someone on this list reporting problems when a=20 certain amount of files were created in a dir. He had to do with=20 audio/video recording, where delays are important (not to have). At one=20 point file creating time increased a lot, but I don't remember if it was=20 a filesystem problem or something else. But as it was the only report I=20 saw, I'd say you are right and a big number of files per dir doesn't=20 matter anymore. =2D-=20 mit freundlichen Gr=FCssen, Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc it-management Internet Services http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee] Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 ****** Aktuelles Radiointerview! ****** http://www.it-podcast.at/aktuelle-sendung.html // Wir haben im Moment zwei H=E4user zu verkaufen: // http://zmi.at/langegg/ // http://zmi.at/haus2009/ --nextPart2733270.f5vIWqtFvQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkxjJLkACgkQzhSR9xwSCbSYSwCgitiYdnwFqzjN3l/I/fYrqoTv p/EAoPZMdS/4+Xdko9AsCQU9c8Uwrjoq =VXNZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2733270.f5vIWqtFvQ-- --===============4153623471444682869== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs --===============4153623471444682869==--